| Line 39: |
Line 39: |
| | *[http://www.examiner.com/x-19682-Atlanta-Church--Culture-Examiner~y2009m8d10-Atheisms-house-of-cards-Part-3] | | *[http://www.examiner.com/x-19682-Atlanta-Church--Culture-Examiner~y2009m8d10-Atheisms-house-of-cards-Part-3] |
| | *[http://creation.com]</ref> In addition, atheists/skeptics do have a tradition of making assumptions that later have proved errant.<ref>http://www.leaderu.com/truth/1truth11.html</ref> Also, prominent atheists, such as [[Charles Darwin]] (see: [http://www.conservapedia.com/Charles_Darwin#Religious_Views_of_Charles_Darwin religious views of Charles Darwin] ), have [[Atheists doubting the validity of atheism|experienced doubts concerning the validity of atheism]]. | | *[http://creation.com]</ref> In addition, atheists/skeptics do have a tradition of making assumptions that later have proved errant.<ref>http://www.leaderu.com/truth/1truth11.html</ref> Also, prominent atheists, such as [[Charles Darwin]] (see: [http://www.conservapedia.com/Charles_Darwin#Religious_Views_of_Charles_Darwin religious views of Charles Darwin] ), have [[Atheists doubting the validity of atheism|experienced doubts concerning the validity of atheism]]. |
| − |
| |
| − | == Atheism is a religion ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Many of the leaders of the atheist movement, such as the evolutionist and [[weak atheism|weak atheist]]/[[agnosticism|agnostic]] [[Richard Dawkins]], argue for [[agnosticism]]/atheism with a religious fervor.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Roderick Ninian Smart, a Scottish writer and professor, defined a seven-part scheme of understanding both religious and secular worldviews<ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=14j2UrLCi64C&pg=PA130&lpg=PA130&dq=ninian+smart+narrative&source=bl&ots=Hq3WwG_mVT&sig=j-8FpwSdqohURYodSdcl46erSJY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=FgybT6zxIc-_gAe864X6Dg&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=ninian%20smart%20narrative&f=false Dimensions of the Sacred, page 2]</ref>. These can be understood as narrative, experiential, social, ethical, doctrinal, ritual and material.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | English Pastor Daniel Smartt defines atheism as a religion, using Ninian Smart's seven dimensions of worldview as a list of criteria. It is not necessary in Smartt's model for every one of these to be present in order for something to be a religion.<ref>[http://www.helium.com/items/1227784-atheism-religion-naturalism-morally-relative "Atheism vs Religion"], Daniel Smartt</ref>. However, it can be argued that all seven are present in the case of atheism.<ref>[http://creation.com/atheism-a-religion Atheism: A religion]</ref><ref>[http://creation.com/atheism Atheism]</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Please see: [http://creation.com/atheism-a-religion Atheism: A religion]and [http://creation.com/atheism Atheism] and [[Atheism is a religion]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === Atheism is a religion and its legal implications relative to the teaching of evolution ===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[Atheism is a religion]] and [[Naturalism (philosophy)|naturalistic]] notions of origins are religious which has legal implications relative to [[evolution]] being taught in public schools.<ref>http://creation.com/atheism-a-religion</ref><ref>http://www.intelligentdesignnetwork.org/Kitzmiller%27s_error_summary.pdf</ref><ref>http://www.intelligentdesignnetwork.org/Kitzmiller%27s_Error.pdf</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | John Calvert, a lawyer and [[intelligent design]] proponent declared:
| |
| − | {{cquote|The Seventh Judicial Circuit of the Court of Appeals of the [[United States]] held that atheism is a [[religion]]. Therefore, it cannot be promoted by a public school. Currently, public schools are often unwittingly promoting atheism through a dogmatic and uncritical teaching of [[Evolution|materialistic theories of origins]].<ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2011/12/effects-of-question-evolution-campaign.html The effects of the Question Evolution! Campaign will be devastating to evolutionary belief and atheism]</ref>}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The atheist philosopher of science [[Michael Ruse]] admitted: "Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today."<ref>Ruse, M., How evolution became a religion: creationists correct? National Post, pp. B1,B3,B7 May 13, 2000.</ref> In the their [[Question evolution! campaign]], [[Creation Ministries International]] asks as a part of their 15 questions for evolutionists: "Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes?...If “you can’t teach religion in science classes”, why is evolution taught?<ref>[http://creation.com/15-questions 15 questions for evolutionists]</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[File:Throat.png|right|165px|thumbnail|A proponent of the [[Question evolution! campaign]] declared that "[[Evolution]] is the air supply of atheism. ..to truly prevail against atheism, cutting off the air supply of atheism is crucial."<ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2011/12/cutting-off-air-supply-of-atheism.html Cutting off the air supply of atheism]</ref>]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === Biblical Christianity vs. evangelical atheism ===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | A proponent of the anti-evolution [[Question evolution! campaign]] by [[Creation Ministries International]] wrote:
| |
| − | {{cquote|Atheism is a religion. And atheists, time and time again, take away the religious liberty of [[Christianity|Christians]] in order to promote their false religion. [[Evolution]] is the air supply of atheism. Directly confronting atheism can be useful. But, the best way for Christianity to prevail against secularism is through preventative medicine. Reaching young people with the gospel and discipling them is a first step. Yet to truly prevail against atheism, cutting off the air supply of atheism is crucial.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The grassroots [http://creation.com/question-evolution Question evolution! campaign] can reach countless young people before evolutionists indoctrinate them in high school and college.<ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2011/12/cutting-off-air-supply-of-atheism.html Cutting off the air supply of atheism]</ref>}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | See also:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | *[[Evolution, Liberalism, Atheism, and Irrationality]]
| |
| − | *[[Creation scientists tend to win the creation vs. evolution debates]]
| |
| − | *[[Atheism and deception]]
| |
| | | | |
| | == Biblical statements concerning atheism == | | == Biblical statements concerning atheism == |