Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 733:
Line 733: + + + + + +
Talk:Essay:Best New Conservative Words (view source)
Revision as of 14:40, June 30, 2013
, 14:40, June 30, 2013→Doubling: The doubling pattern was not the initial expectation. Rather, the existence of that pattern quickly emerged and has been repeatedly confirmed, layer after layer, over 30 times.
I agree with you on many issues Mr. Schlafly, but I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one, [[User:JAnderson|Jacob]] [[User talk:Anderson|Anderson]] 08:07, 30 June 2013 (EDT)
I agree with you on many issues Mr. Schlafly, but I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one, [[User:JAnderson|Jacob]] [[User talk:Anderson|Anderson]] 08:07, 30 June 2013 (EDT)
:The doubling pattern was not the initial expectation. Rather, the existence of that pattern quickly emerged and has been repeatedly confirmed, layer after layer, over 30 times.
:The specific objections above are like arguing that a DNA match is meaningless if an investigator was looking for the match. Also, no one rebutted the analogy of the significance of easily finding gold nuggets in a stream.
:As to the objection that the words are not conservative, I don't see how that can seriously doubted. And, indeed, one Conservapedia visitor ran an analysis of political speeches and confirmed that conservatives use these words more than liberals do.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:40, 30 June 2013 (EDT)