Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 296: Line 296:  
::<i>The steepest uptick occurred in the most recent era from 2000-2009, during which incidence rose 3.6 percent per year.</i>
 
::<i>The steepest uptick occurred in the most recent era from 2000-2009, during which incidence rose 3.6 percent per year.</i>
 
::Keeping in mind that the study is about women in the 25-39 age group, the group around 2000 (before the uptick) are not pre-abortion.  Even the oldest (age 39) member of the least cancerous cohort (in 2000) would have been age 12 when  Roe v. Wade was decided in January 1973.  In other words, even the early, healthy, group in the study were of child-bearing age in the abort era.  As much as I'd like for this study to support this case, I don't see how it does. [[User:MelH|MelH]] 15:32, 2 July 2013 (EDT)
 
::Keeping in mind that the study is about women in the 25-39 age group, the group around 2000 (before the uptick) are not pre-abortion.  Even the oldest (age 39) member of the least cancerous cohort (in 2000) would have been age 12 when  Roe v. Wade was decided in January 1973.  In other words, even the early, healthy, group in the study were of child-bearing age in the abort era.  As much as I'd like for this study to support this case, I don't see how it does. [[User:MelH|MelH]] 15:32, 2 July 2013 (EDT)
 +
 +
Here is a link to a reputable source that more than confirms the hypothesis.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1288955/Abortion-triple-risk-breast-cancer.html
 +
--[[User:Tomqua|Tomqua]] 16:02, 2 July 2013 (EDT)
    
==Tamerlan Tsarnaev==  
 
==Tamerlan Tsarnaev==  
73

edits

Navigation menu