Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
251 bytes added ,  04:18, July 5, 2013
I've thought the same about how Peter courageously acted in self-defense against hundreds of Roman soldiers. His "denial" later was a strategic decision, and not any lack in faith.
Line 42: Line 42:     
::::When you take this act into account, his actions at the temple are to be seen in a completely different light. Surely he was endangering himself by coming into that place, facing the possibility of being apprehended by the Jewish authorities for what he had done to the high priest's slave. With all these facts taken into account, we can clearly see that Peter was the first in faith, even when we acknowledge his denial of Christ. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 23:12, 4 July 2013 (EDT)
 
::::When you take this act into account, his actions at the temple are to be seen in a completely different light. Surely he was endangering himself by coming into that place, facing the possibility of being apprehended by the Jewish authorities for what he had done to the high priest's slave. With all these facts taken into account, we can clearly see that Peter was the first in faith, even when we acknowledge his denial of Christ. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 23:12, 4 July 2013 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::I've thought the same about how Peter courageously acted in self-defense against hundreds of Roman soldiers.  His "denial" later was a strategic decision, and not any lack in [[faith]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:18, 5 July 2013 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,305

edits

Navigation menu