288
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 253:
Line 253: − +
This entry seems to be about Bartoli, not Murray. Nothing remarkable about Murray winning, and it has nothing to do with CP's correct prediction coming true on the women's side
|[[Best of the public]] is triumphing at [[Wimbledon]]
|[[Best of the public]] is triumphing at [[Wimbledon]]
||Not a single person suggested that a low seed couldn't win a tournament (see the discussion [[Talk:Main_Page#Tennis|here]]) - which would have been silly because low seeds have won before; rather, there was dispute over categorizing low-ranking professionals as "best of public" and the misunderstanding of the ranking system.
||Not a single person suggested that a low seed couldn't win a tournament (see the discussion [[Talk:Main_Page#Tennis|here]]) - which would have been silly because low seeds have won before; rather, there was dispute over categorizing low-ranking professionals as "best of public" and the misunderstanding of the ranking system.
|relatively obscure Marion Bartoli won Wimbledon '''''without losing an entire set the entire tournament''''', the rarest of achievements. '''The expert, number two seed, Andy Murray won the men's tournament; defeating a field of "best of publics".'''
|relatively obscure Marion Bartoli won Wimbledon '''''without losing an entire set the entire tournament''''', the rarest of achievements.
|July 6, 2013
|July 6, 2013
|}
|}