2,014
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 24:
Line 24: + +
Conservapedia talk:Userboxes (view source)
Revision as of 04:27, April 14, 2007
, 04:27, April 14, 2007reverting to last working version?
:::::I feel like a Bureaucrat-in-chief-wanna-be with that "nice work" thing. Somebody please slap me, now. Anyway, I think maybe later tonight, when all the good little elves are asleep (to avoid edit conflicts) I'll copy the source over into notepad, clean up the dupes and do a little categorizing, and copy it back. I'm so glad I found these, I ''totally live'' for userboxes. (How did I find them? Copied over my UXB list from WP to see what would happen...) [[User:Human|Human]] 20:23, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::I feel like a Bureaucrat-in-chief-wanna-be with that "nice work" thing. Somebody please slap me, now. Anyway, I think maybe later tonight, when all the good little elves are asleep (to avoid edit conflicts) I'll copy the source over into notepad, clean up the dupes and do a little categorizing, and copy it back. I'm so glad I found these, I ''totally live'' for userboxes. (How did I find them? Copied over my UXB list from WP to see what would happen...) [[User:Human|Human]] 20:23, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::Slap! But that's for the barely-disguised profanity. There's nothing wrong with complimenting another user. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:47, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::Slap! But that's for the barely-disguised profanity. There's nothing wrong with complimenting another user. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:47, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
Thanks I needed that :) And thank you for, making me feel ok about giving a compliment. Anyway, the reason for this comment is that the table format of this page got all screwed up, so I reverted it to the last version that worked. I hope I did not remove anyone's hard work. Please, if there is any confusion, use our talk pages to resolve the issue so this meta-article can work well. [[User:Human|Human]] 00:27, 14 April 2007 (EDT)