Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,148
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 206:
Line 206: − +
Conservapedia talk:Commandments (view source)
Revision as of 22:16, July 19, 2013
, 22:16, July 19, 2013→Proposal for non-public figures
</div>[[User:GregG|GregG]] 01:27, 19 July 2013 (EDT)
</div>[[User:GregG|GregG]] 01:27, 19 July 2013 (EDT)
:Are you suggesting that Mr. Schlafly abandon his thoughts on the [[best of the public]] and become a liberal elitist? Your attempt to change the commandments reminds me of the story of [[Haman]] and [[Esther]]! Yet, the [[VivaYehshua]] article is safe from destruction and safe from your evolutionist machinations!
:Are you suggesting that Mr. Schlafly abandon his thoughts on the [[best of the public]] and become a liberal elitist? Your attempt to change the commandments reminds me of the story of [[Haman]] and [[Esther]]! Yet, the [[VivaYehshua]] article is safe from destruction and safe from your evolutionist machinations!
:By the way, [[VivaYehshua]] would handily win a debate against [[Kenneth Miller]] on the [http://creation.com/15-questions 15 questions] for evolutionists. Why don't you ask Mr. Miller to debate him? Mr. Miller could use the publicity given the public's boredom with evolutionary indoctrination and their loss of interest in Mr. Miller's pseudoscience.[https://siteanalytics.compete.com/millerandlevine.com/][http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/09/internet-evangelism-cutting-edge-pro.html][http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/05/is-public-tiring-of-hearing.html] Creationists are quite pleased with the rise of global creationism even in secular Western countries while evolutionists grow increasingly glum, frustrated and resort to desperation tactics such as scientific fraud.[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/07/5-reasons-why-creationists-are-joyous.html][http://creation.com/science-fraud-epidemic]
::First of all, the proposed commandment would not prevent any contributor from making edits to Conservapedia. The best of the public would still be able to add their own insights to any of our articles, debates, or essays. My proposed commandment is simply a natural extension of our commandments requiring content to be "true and verifiable" and barring gossip (commandments which are very difficult to follow when adding content about non-public figures), as well as our privacy policy. Legally, it's probably also a good idea to prevent content from being added about non-public figures, as we have better protection against defamation claims from public figures.
::First of all, the proposed commandment would not prevent any contributor from making edits to Conservapedia. The best of the public would still be able to add their own insights to any of our articles, debates, or essays. My proposed commandment is simply a natural extension of our commandments requiring content to be "true and verifiable" and barring gossip (commandments which are very difficult to follow when adding content about non-public figures), as well as our privacy policy. Legally, it's probably also a good idea to prevent content from being added about non-public figures, as we have better protection against defamation claims from public figures.
::'''I should also point out that our article [[VivaYehshua]] does not adhere to our high verifiability standards'''. All the "sources" provided are anonymous articles using the same screen name on the same blog, which has no reputation for fact-checking or accuracy. And yet you think this is such a paragon of encyclopedic achievement that us mere mortals cannot edit nor even discuss proposed edits to it. Words fail me. [[User:GregG|GregG]] 16:53, 19 July 2013 (EDT)
::'''I should also point out that our article [[VivaYehshua]] does not adhere to our high verifiability standards'''. All the "sources" provided are anonymous articles using the same screen name on the same blog, which has no reputation for fact-checking or accuracy. And yet you think this is such a paragon of encyclopedic achievement that us mere mortals cannot edit nor even discuss proposed edits to it. Words fail me. [[User:GregG|GregG]] 16:53, 19 July 2013 (EDT)