88
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 570:
Line 570: + + + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Commandments (view source)
Revision as of 08:53, April 14, 2007
, 08:53, April 14, 2007"No Unlawful Activity?"
:The additional problem is: What is a "quality edit"? Is copyediting an article a "quality edit"? What about fixing a dead-end page by inserting links? What about reverting vandalism? If I revert fifty articles that had been replaced with "CONSERVAPEDIA SUCKS!", does that count for or against my ratio? Is discussing policy (or even ''writing'' policy) a quality edit? What about helping editors or even sysops with technical problems?
:The additional problem is: What is a "quality edit"? Is copyediting an article a "quality edit"? What about fixing a dead-end page by inserting links? What about reverting vandalism? If I revert fifty articles that had been replaced with "CONSERVAPEDIA SUCKS!", does that count for or against my ratio? Is discussing policy (or even ''writing'' policy) a quality edit? What about helping editors or even sysops with technical problems?
:These things will change the way some people act. And I doubt it will be for the better. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 07:51, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
:These things will change the way some people act. And I doubt it will be for the better. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 07:51, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
== "No Unlawful Activity?" ==
'''Sources should be authoritative works, not merely published opinions by others. No sources advocating or supporting unlawful activity of any kind are allowed.'''
Whoops--ok, no quotes from [[Harriet Tubman]] (Helped slaves to escape to [[Canada]]), [[Martin Luther King Jr]] (Broke racial segregation laws), [[Oliver North]] (Iran-Contra Scandal), [[Mohandas Gandhi]] (rebellion against the British Empire), or the [[Declaration of Independence]] (Treason against His Royal Highness, King George the Third), then? --[[User:BobD|BobD]] 04:53, 14 April 2007 (EDT)