88
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 18:
Line 18: + +
Debate:The liberal quotient of Conservapedia; what is it? Does it matter? (view source)
Revision as of 09:46, April 14, 2007
, 09:46, April 14, 2007no edit summary
To ease the process of analysis, why not create two categories (Liberal Conservapedians, Conservative Conservapedians), so that there might develop at least a basis in self-identification on which to base the LQ (and it's reciprocal, the CQ)? I know this isn't a talk page, but we should sign debate comments, right? [[User:Human|Human]] 17:07, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
To ease the process of analysis, why not create two categories (Liberal Conservapedians, Conservative Conservapedians), so that there might develop at least a basis in self-identification on which to base the LQ (and it's reciprocal, the CQ)? I know this isn't a talk page, but we should sign debate comments, right? [[User:Human|Human]] 17:07, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
This is a great idea. Now we'll all know who to ignore before we have to read a single word they've written, thus avoiding potential memetic contamination. </SARCASM> --[[User:BobD|BobD]] 05:46, 14 April 2007 (EDT)