nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 30:
Line 30: + +
Conservapedia talk:Userboxes (view source)
Revision as of 13:00, April 14, 2007
, 13:00, April 14, 2007→Layout: Agree, iff...
Before anyone reverts, I would like to state that I find the columnar layout to be much less disorienting. I would like to change <nowiki>{{UB}}</nowiki> to produce two collumns, but I believe that obtaining feedback before I do so would be preferable to a change without the input of other users. --[[User:Hacker|Hacker]]<sup><code>([[User talk:Hacker|Write some code]])</code></sup> 08:20, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
Before anyone reverts, I would like to state that I find the columnar layout to be much less disorienting. I would like to change <nowiki>{{UB}}</nowiki> to produce two collumns, but I believe that obtaining feedback before I do so would be preferable to a change without the input of other users. --[[User:Hacker|Hacker]]<sup><code>([[User talk:Hacker|Write some code]])</code></sup> 08:20, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
:I prefer the columnar layout too, I think. But how would you change {{tl|UB}}? If you change it so that it can take two userboxes, that's a lot of editing, and confusion for people adding new items to the index. If you can change {{tl|UB}} in such as way that it produces two columns but still with one userbox per inclusion of the template, that would probably be a good idea, but I don't know if that's possible. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:00, 14 April 2007 (EDT)