SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
1,131
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Civil Rights Movement (view source)
Revision as of 07:04, September 2, 2013
, 07:04, September 2, 2013→New Section: new section
were more Black Power activists - and revolutionaries- than civil rights advocates. [[User:AliceBG|AliceBG]] 15:59, 1 March 2008 (EST)
were more Black Power activists - and revolutionaries- than civil rights advocates. [[User:AliceBG|AliceBG]] 15:59, 1 March 2008 (EST)
== New Section ==
Created a new section on the role the GOP has consistently played in the Civil Rights movement since I thought it relevant, it can be moved lower on the page if people want. I have done a thorough analysis of the Democrat claim that the parties switched here.[https://www.facebook.com/notes/joshua-david-zambrano/the-dixiecrat-myth/10151908394299392] Anyway, there are Congressional links relating to vote totals mentioned there that can be used here, e.g.:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/88-1964/h182
http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/FinalSenatePassageCR1964.pdf
http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/CivilRightsAct1964.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/big/0619.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_switching_in_the_United_States#1960s
Anyway, I just figured Conservapedia could use this information. My current website isn't really political so I'm not going to be using this information except when debating anyway, so I figured I'd put it on the site if you want to go into more detail with it. I may not have time to work on the section much more so if anyone wants to research, detail, and source this more thoroughly it would be with my encouragement. --[[User:JZambrano|Joshua Zambrano]] 03:04, 2 September 2013 (EDT)