2,732
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: + +
Talk:Essay:Liberal Falsehoods (view source)
Revision as of 15:02, April 14, 2007
, 15:02, April 14, 2007no edit summary
: Ames, I would have thought you'd oppose this on the "falsehood" grounds. Perhaps you should ask them to prove that the assertion that "there must be life on other planets" is false. (Also, I'd say the whole thing misrepresents the position on this matter, I think it would be better rendered "in all probability there is life on other planets" --[[User:Abrown|Abrown]] 10:59, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
: Ames, I would have thought you'd oppose this on the "falsehood" grounds. Perhaps you should ask them to prove that the assertion that "there must be life on other planets" is false. (Also, I'd say the whole thing misrepresents the position on this matter, I think it would be better rendered "in all probability there is life on other planets" --[[User:Abrown|Abrown]] 10:59, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
All in due time, Abrown. But good catches, on all parts. Andy, cross-apply, please - can you prove that intelligent life doesn't exist in the universe? Let's have a thought experiment - I have ''faith'' that extraterrestrials exist.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 11:02, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
== Extraterrestrial life ''must'' exist? ==
== Extraterrestrial life ''must'' exist? ==