1,767
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32:
Line 32: + +
→la to ta and la-di-da
::[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?l=b&p=9| Here] is an online English resource. It's secular so it might not count.[[User:Rob Pommer| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub>
::[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?l=b&p=9| Here] is an online English resource. It's secular so it might not count.[[User:Rob Pommer| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub>
::[http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/first/scriptures.html PBS] and [http://www.biblepath.com/bible_sbd.html another] source. I don't quite understand why you don't accept the dictionary.reference.com source, though. So far, everything seems to point at "ta biblia" - are you saying that they're all wrong? And why does the opening post keep vanishing? --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 12:52, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
::[http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/first/scriptures.html PBS] and [http://www.biblepath.com/bible_sbd.html another] source. I don't quite understand why you don't accept the dictionary.reference.com source, though. So far, everything seems to point at "ta biblia" - are you saying that they're all wrong? And why does the opening post keep vanishing? --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 12:52, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
::<big>'''Oh, I see you blocked the guy who made the opening post...'''</big> --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 12:57, 14 April 2007 (EDT)