Changes

===The foreign press on Hiss===

===The foreign press on Hiss===

Outside the U.S., where fewer people are invested [http://www.tnr.com/article/bohemian-rhapsody the myth] of Hiss's innocence, the press is less equivocal: "[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/daniel_finkelstein/article3441328.ece We know] that Alger Hiss was guilty," reports the ''Times'' of London, adding that Hiss's guilt is "[http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/non-fiction/article1394730.ece beyond doubt]"; the ''Daily Telegraph'' agrees that the evidence that Hiss was a Soviet agent is now "[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/5648274/Spies-The-Rise-and-Fall-of-the-KGB-in-America-By-John-Earl-Haynes-Harvey-Klehr-and-Alexander-Vassiliev-review.html beyond doubt]." The ''Financial Times'' concurs that there is now "[http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/a2819a20-77e2-11de-9713-00144feabdc0.html no doubt] that [Hiss] was indeed a Soviet spy." Writing in the ''Independent'', [http://johannhari.com/2008/10/26/an-interview-with-johann-for-the-newspaper-cherwell/ self-proclaimed "social democrat"] Johann Hari admits that "the left's old ''cause célèbre'', Alger Hiss," is among those shown by [[Venona project|Venona]] to have been "[http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/johann-hari/the-exhumation-of-joe-mccarthy-567642.html Soviet spies]." Even the ''Guardian'', Britain's leading [http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-4730959/The-Guardian-Britain-s-leading.html left-wing newspaper]<ref>''Guardian'' readers are often [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3159813.stm stereotyped] as [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/4348620.stm politically correct] [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmhansrd/vo011119/debtext/11119-08.htm#11119-08_spnew3 caricatures]. The ''Guardian'' is so left-wing (by British standards) that its competitors sometimes refer to it as the British equivalent [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/michael_gove/article2379430.ece of the ''New York Times''].</ref> concedes that "[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/1999/may/15/michaelellison the general view]" is  "that Hiss was guilty."

Outside the U.S., where fewer people are invested [http://www.tnr.com/article/bohemian-rhapsody the myth] of Hiss's innocence, the press is less equivocal: "[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/daniel_finkelstein/article3441328.ece We know] that Alger Hiss was guilty," reports the ''Times'' of London, adding that Hiss's guilt is "[http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/non-fiction/article1394730.ece beyond doubt]"; the ''Daily Telegraph'' agrees that the evidence that Hiss was a Soviet agent is now "[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/5648274/Spies-The-Rise-and-Fall-of-the-KGB-in-America-By-John-Earl-Haynes-Harvey-Klehr-and-Alexander-Vassiliev-review.html beyond doubt]." The ''Financial Times'' concurs that there is now "[http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/a2819a20-77e2-11de-9713-00144feabdc0.html no doubt] that [Hiss] was indeed a Soviet spy." Writing in London's "[http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/editorials/editorial-a-liberal-gamble-too-far-8468336.html proudly liberal]" ''Independent'', [http://johannhari.com/2008/10/26/an-interview-with-johann-for-the-newspaper-cherwell/ self-proclaimed "social democrat"] Johann Hari admits that "the left's old ''cause célèbre'', Alger Hiss," is among those shown by [[Venona project|Venona]] to have been "[http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/johann-hari/the-exhumation-of-joe-mccarthy-567642.html Soviet spies]." Even the ''Guardian'', Britain's leading [http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-4730959/The-Guardian-Britain-s-leading.html left-wing newspaper]<ref>''Guardian'' readers are often [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3159813.stm stereotyped] as [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/4348620.stm politically correct] [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmhansrd/vo011119/debtext/11119-08.htm#11119-08_spnew3 caricatures]. The ''Guardian'' is so left-wing (by British standards) that its competitors sometimes refer to it as the British equivalent [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/michael_gove/article2379430.ece of the ''New York Times''].</ref> concedes that "[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/1999/may/15/michaelellison the general view]" is  "that Hiss was guilty."

===Newsweeklies on Hiss===

===Newsweeklies on Hiss===