23
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + +
no edit summary
If the Cerne Abbas Giant is considered to be obscene, why is this allowed? http://www.conservapedia.com/Michelangelo
If the Cerne Abbas Giant is considered to be obscene, why is this allowed? http://www.conservapedia.com/Michelangelo
:I think this is an interesting point. On the Brest Exam talk page, where there is an ongoing discussion re "obscene" pictures someone makes the point that whereas they would delete photographs of naked people it is ok to have a picture of ''David'' because that is a statue, and not a real person. Surely that applies here also? You really need to have a clear policy in place because at the moment we are getting these inconsistencies. Also, threatening someone with a banning just for this seems pretty draconian; it's not like he's posting up porn or something. It IS a very well known landmark and I think it is over the top to label it obscene, just as it would be crazy to remove the picture from the Michelangelo page. [[User:Silverfish|Silverfish]] 14:12, 14 April 2007 (EDT)