Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
106 bytes added ,  11:02, October 26, 2013
no edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:  
For example, "I heard [[thunder]]" is a sufficient condition of "There was lightning nearby," because if I heard thunder, there ''must'' have been [[lightning]] nearby to cause it.
 
For example, "I heard [[thunder]]" is a sufficient condition of "There was lightning nearby," because if I heard thunder, there ''must'' have been [[lightning]] nearby to cause it.
 
However, "There was lightning nearby" is ''not'' a sufficient cause of "I heard thunder," because there may have been lightning nearby that I did not hear.
 
However, "There was lightning nearby" is ''not'' a sufficient cause of "I heard thunder," because there may have been lightning nearby that I did not hear.
 +
 +
 +
From the affirmation of a sufficient condition, one may infer that the [[necessary condition]] is true.
    
[[Category:Logic]]
 
[[Category:Logic]]
SkipCaptcha
682

edits

Navigation menu