Changes

== la to ta and la-di-da ==

== la to ta and la-di-da ==

Karajou, when are you going to {{remove personal remark|crawl out of your arrogant ignorance and}} accept that your beloved Merrill Unger (or his typesetter) was wrong: ta is the neuter plural nominative definite article; biblia is plural of biblion and hence takes ta.  You have been given sources, you have been given evidence, but like the disgraced prosecutor in the Duke case you insist on defining evidence in your own incomprehensible manner.  To top it off, you then attempt to pass yourself off as an expert in things of which your comprehension is negligible at best.

Karajou, when are you going to {{remove personal remark|crawl out of your arrogant ignorance and}} accept that your beloved Merrill Unger (or his typesetter) was wrong: ta is the neuter plural nominative definite article; biblia is plural of biblion and hence takes ta.  You have been given sources, you have been given evidence, but like the disgraced prosecutor in the Duke case you insist on defining evidence in your own incomprehensible manner.  {{remove personal remark|To top it off, you then attempt to pass yourself off as an expert in things of which your comprehension is negligible at best.}}

Your constant inane assertion that the bible was attacked not merely questioned points to your own immaturity, your inability to differentiate between gradation of meaning and the weakness of your faith.  If you truly had faith, you would merely respond calmly to the questions {{remove personal remark|rather than acting like a psychotic on hallucinogens.  Face it the littlest question bothers you because in the recesses of your sputtering hive-mind you know there may be truth in the questions.  Essentially then, you are a coward: rather than face the issues, rather than face the uncertainties welling up like flood waters from the depths of your soul you repeat as a mantra biblical apologetics and bible verses and dogma.  

Your constant inane assertion that the bible was attacked not merely questioned points to your own immaturity, your inability to differentiate between gradation of meaning and the weakness of your faith.  If you truly had faith, you would merely respond calmly to the questions {{remove personal remark|rather than acting like a psychotic on hallucinogens.  Face it the littlest question bothers you because in the recesses of your sputtering hive-mind you know there may be truth in the questions.  Essentially then, you are a coward: rather than face the issues, rather than face the uncertainties welling up like flood waters from the depths of your soul you repeat as a mantra biblical apologetics and bible verses and dogma.