Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:  
Wikipedia has a liberal bias. Wikipedia is anti-Christian and anti-American. We need for a new online encylodpaedia to balance that out.  
 
Wikipedia has a liberal bias. Wikipedia is anti-Christian and anti-American. We need for a new online encylodpaedia to balance that out.  
 
[[User:HarryPalms|HarryPalms]]
 
[[User:HarryPalms|HarryPalms]]
 +
::How is saying that it's biased in the opposite way to something else evidence that it is "fair and balanced"? You seem to be admitting that it is in face neither [[User:Silverfish|Silverfish]] 16:56, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
    
:How can Wikipedia have a liberal bias?  Anyone can edit it and biased opinions are scrupulously edited out.  Conservapedia is not based on the principles of balanced scrutiny or honesty like Wikipedia is; it is just a place where conservatives can blast their misinformed opinions at other conservatives.  This is just like the pouty consevatives that run this country; if people dismiss their ridiculous anti-scientific, intolerant garbage, they whine about their critics being anti-Christian and go cry to the religious right.  Can any one of you name even one example of Wikipedia being biased? (note that being secular and listening to opinions outside America is not bias!)   
 
:How can Wikipedia have a liberal bias?  Anyone can edit it and biased opinions are scrupulously edited out.  Conservapedia is not based on the principles of balanced scrutiny or honesty like Wikipedia is; it is just a place where conservatives can blast their misinformed opinions at other conservatives.  This is just like the pouty consevatives that run this country; if people dismiss their ridiculous anti-scientific, intolerant garbage, they whine about their critics being anti-Christian and go cry to the religious right.  Can any one of you name even one example of Wikipedia being biased? (note that being secular and listening to opinions outside America is not bias!)   
23

edits

Navigation menu