238
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + +
Talk:Atheism and rape (view source)
Revision as of 18:25, December 12, 2013
, 18:25, December 12, 2013no edit summary
==Atheist Offers No Condemnation Of Rape==
Well of course it doesn't, it's not a religion. It's a broad camp with multiple and varying philosophies. Believe it not, theism offers no condemnation either. All you need to be a theist is believe in god(s), no structure is needed to be a theist. Christianity, Islam, Judism, are merely sub-sects of theism. You have a better case to condemn those who are irreligious. That's not the same as atheism; but you can make a case that the irreligious are without moral guidance as there are plenty of atheists who take non-divine sources as moral guidance. There are atheistic religions (like Buddhism, Anton LaVey's Church Of Satan, atheistic Christianity) just as there are irreligious theists (Deists). --[[User:Dsherman|Dsherman]] 13:25, 12 December 2013 (EST)
Wow...so two atheists are complete jackwads and this allows you to tar anyone who doesn't believe in your almight sky daddy. wtg [[User:SterlingMaloryArcher|SterlingMaloryArcher]] 20:41, 16 February 2012 (EST)
Wow...so two atheists are complete jackwads and this allows you to tar anyone who doesn't believe in your almight sky daddy. wtg [[User:SterlingMaloryArcher|SterlingMaloryArcher]] 20:41, 16 February 2012 (EST)
::Why does TheAmazingAtheist still have over 280,000 subscribers? Is the Freedom From Religion Foundation merely a shadow of its former shelf post [[Dan Barker]]'s statements? Why is there not a single piece of negative information on Dan Barker's [[Wikipedia]] page?[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Barker] Where is the negative reporting of Dan Barker on this [http://www.freethoughtpedia.com/wiki/Dan_Barker atheist/skeptic wiki]? Of course, this is easy to explain. Atheists love their [[sin]] and hate God. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:09, 16 February 2012 (EST)
::Why does TheAmazingAtheist still have over 280,000 subscribers? Is the Freedom From Religion Foundation merely a shadow of its former shelf post [[Dan Barker]]'s statements? Why is there not a single piece of negative information on Dan Barker's [[Wikipedia]] page?[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Barker] Where is the negative reporting of Dan Barker on this [http://www.freethoughtpedia.com/wiki/Dan_Barker atheist/skeptic wiki]? Of course, this is easy to explain. Atheists love their [[sin]] and hate God. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:09, 16 February 2012 (EST)