Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,824
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 62:
Line 62: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Macroevolution article - request a ruling
:I agree with Scorpion on this point. There are a lot of editors here who wish to help improve the article. It is nice to see a decision finally made and hope that it does heaps of good for the site. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 08:31, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
:I agree with Scorpion on this point. There are a lot of editors here who wish to help improve the article. It is nice to see a decision finally made and hope that it does heaps of good for the site. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 08:31, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
== Macroevolution article - request a ruling ==
I am writing to you regarding the current [[Macroevolution]] article. I find the current article unacceptable and given your stated position on the [[Theory of evolution]] article I would like you to rule on this subject.
Currently the article has these statements:
"Paleontology, developmental biology, and comparative genomics contribute most of the empirical evidence for the known patterns and processes that can be classified as macroevolution."
Next the article has a section entitled:
"Methods of Macroevolution"
This of course assumes that macroevolution occurred.
If you could rule on this matter it would be appreciated. In the meantime, I am going to revert back to the non Pro-evolutionary theory version. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:08, 14 April 2007 (EDT)conservative