Changes

*defines who 'everyone' is

*defines who 'everyone' is

*defines the way this 'everyone' use it.  

*defines the way this 'everyone' use it.  

:Ad. "you name ''why...do you name only one person, the person who opposed Pasteur's theories on abiogenesis?''"

:Ad. "''why...do you name only one person, the person who opposed Pasteur's theories on abiogenesis?''"

::Because:

::Because:

*To name all disturbed characters in the world with make the list uncomfortably long and unrealistic

*To name all disturbed characters in the world would make the list uncomfortably long and unrealistic

*Example is something or someone chosen from a group in order to show what the whole group is like; that's very nature of example that you choose one or few examples

*Example is something or someone chosen from a group in order to show what the whole group is like; that's the very nature of example(s) - you choose one or few instances  to represent certain phenomena

*The article is not finished, it is first stage and I plan to add few more examples later on, don't be afraid.

*The article is not finished, it is first stage and I plan to add few more examples later on, don't be afraid.

::Note: I removed your note on evolutionists which was: "Many of these people were "evolutionists" in the pre-Darwin sense of the word, in that they believed in a "tree of life" or "Great Chain of Being", without claiming to know how that chain came into existence." Reason: While it is true that evolutionists were pre-Darwinian, the description that follows  does not make them different from Darwinians who also believed in tree of life [which was by the way the only drawing in Darwin's 'On origins of species...'] and also did not claim to know how that chain [sometimes starting at so called first replicant] came into existence. That's why such a note is irrelevant.  

::Note: I removed your note on evolutionists which was: "Many of these people were "evolutionists" in the pre-Darwin sense of the word, in that they believed in a "tree of life" or "Great Chain of Being", without claiming to know how that chain came into existence." Reason: While it is true that these evolutionists were pre-Darwinian, the description that follows  does not make them different from Darwinians who also believed in tree of life [which was by the way the only drawing in Darwin's 'On origins of species...'] and also did not claim to know how that chain [sometimes starting at so called first replicant] came into existence. That's why such a note is irrelevant, a fortiori since the article does not name these evolutionists 'Darwinian'. Description of these people is supported by sources hence pls. just read them and do not change something that is sourced.  

I hope this helps.--[[User:AK|AK]] 18:27, 19 December 2013 (EST)

I hope this helps.--[[User:AK|AK]] 18:27, 19 December 2013 (EST)