SkipCaptcha, nsSupply_SidersR, nsSupply_Siders_
8,436
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 148:
Line 148: + + + +
Talk:Disturbed character (view source)
Revision as of 19:49, December 21, 2013
, 19:49, December 21, 2013→Notable: new section
So, yes, the issues of abiogenesis and the "tree of life" were usually thought about together. And a thoughtful discussion of how these issues played out in the debates of the 19th century would certainly be a good thing. But just saying that those who opposed Pasteur's theories about life-only-from-life were "evolutionists" is a monumentally gross oversimplification. I know you can do better.
So, yes, the issues of abiogenesis and the "tree of life" were usually thought about together. And a thoughtful discussion of how these issues played out in the debates of the 19th century would certainly be a good thing. But just saying that those who opposed Pasteur's theories about life-only-from-life were "evolutionists" is a monumentally gross oversimplification. I know you can do better.
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 14:00, 21 December 2013 (EST)
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 14:00, 21 December 2013 (EST)
== Notable ==
Guys this topic isn't notable - fork it into the George Simon article; leave the example out.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 14:49, 21 December 2013 (EST)