238
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + +
Talk:Conversion therapy (view source)
Revision as of 19:56, December 21, 2013
, 19:56, December 21, 2013no edit summary
==Proposed Changes==
In the very near future , I'd like to expand the article to include some more detail of techniques (the article in its current form is not very informative). I'd do it now but it requires research to fully flesh it out complete with citations. I planned to include a detailed list of common techniques and a bit more information on the reasons given why much of the medical community is not in favor of these techniques. My question is....am I allowed to make it as detailed as possible (no matter where the data takes me) or must I follow guidelines to ensure that it is presented in the brightest light possible? --DavidS 14:56, 21 December 2013 (EST)
{{unprotected|29 December 2007|Ed Poor}}
{{unprotected|29 December 2007|Ed Poor}}
I made these changes after an argument with Ed Poor on IRC. In an effort to be fair, I have divided the page into sections for & against.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 11:13, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
I made these changes after an argument with Ed Poor on IRC. In an effort to be fair, I have divided the page into sections for & against.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 11:13, 26 April 2007 (EDT)