Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 154: Line 154:     
::Which topic, please clarify. If you mean 'disturbed character', then please advise what criterion you are using, the argument [[Ipse dixit]] (ca 'because I said') is not the best one, IMHO. You failed to react on my following point: "as for Clemenceau, I can answer that I regard him for adequately representing the class, everything needed is evaluation of described behavior against criteria. If you wait for twenty years for an opportunity to thwart certain scientist who makes discoveries and helps to develop methods against suffering and dying of people from rabies just because this scientist showed that your evolutionary views were in error, then it is impossible to make other conclusion." So do you regard such people who do such things as these evolutionists did to Pasteur as undisturbed characters? Isn't the goal of CP to counter such tendencies in society which lead to [[Expelled|losses of jobs]] just because someone's opinion differs from evolutionary views? Are you evolutionists? Could be your worldview is skewing your attitudes towards this article? Do you regard Clemenceau for creationist if you are opposed so vehemently to sourced information claiming that he was evolutionist? I suggest we invite more people into this discussion prior to any further changes. Neither of you seem to be enlisted as [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&group=sysop&limit=100 administrator] hence where do you assume to have the authority over this article from? Are you opposing the [[Question evolution campaign]] as well?--[[User:AK|AK]] 15:43, 21 December 2013 (EST)
 
::Which topic, please clarify. If you mean 'disturbed character', then please advise what criterion you are using, the argument [[Ipse dixit]] (ca 'because I said') is not the best one, IMHO. You failed to react on my following point: "as for Clemenceau, I can answer that I regard him for adequately representing the class, everything needed is evaluation of described behavior against criteria. If you wait for twenty years for an opportunity to thwart certain scientist who makes discoveries and helps to develop methods against suffering and dying of people from rabies just because this scientist showed that your evolutionary views were in error, then it is impossible to make other conclusion." So do you regard such people who do such things as these evolutionists did to Pasteur as undisturbed characters? Isn't the goal of CP to counter such tendencies in society which lead to [[Expelled|losses of jobs]] just because someone's opinion differs from evolutionary views? Are you evolutionists? Could be your worldview is skewing your attitudes towards this article? Do you regard Clemenceau for creationist if you are opposed so vehemently to sourced information claiming that he was evolutionist? I suggest we invite more people into this discussion prior to any further changes. Neither of you seem to be enlisted as [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&group=sysop&limit=100 administrator] hence where do you assume to have the authority over this article from? Are you opposing the [[Question evolution campaign]] as well?--[[User:AK|AK]] 15:43, 21 December 2013 (EST)
 +
:::One more note, I do not like the bastardization of the article you did and I was thinking whether you both are not some saboteurs here at CP that do more activities on talk pages and destroying the articles than being productive and creative. I've remembered there was a rule applied to such users and now it seems I'm not the only one having that impression, just have a look: "It is implicit given that it is a news story, and the change is also verifiable by researching other stories. Are you more interested in what the truth is, or in debating debate tactics? Please give it a rest - I count more than 50 consecutive talk-page edits from your account, which is far more than the 90/10 rule would typically allow.--Aschlafly 21:30, 7 December 2013 (EST)" I strongly agree with this opinion.--[[User:AK|AK]] 15:58, 21 December 2013 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,947

edits

Navigation menu