Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎I find it interesting,...: Debate requires controversy. The choices and rankings were pretty obvious this year.
Line 56: Line 56:     
...that there are only a handful of users discussing the question of who is the "Conservative of the Year," and that there are, based on a quick count, fewer than five people who have been with the project for more than a year who are involved in the debate. To what do you account this lack of enthusiasm? [[User:EddyJ|EddyJ]] 01:02, 1 January 2014 (EST)
 
...that there are only a handful of users discussing the question of who is the "Conservative of the Year," and that there are, based on a quick count, fewer than five people who have been with the project for more than a year who are involved in the debate. To what do you account this lack of enthusiasm? [[User:EddyJ|EddyJ]] 01:02, 1 January 2014 (EST)
 +
 +
:Debate requires controversy.  The choices and rankings were pretty obvious this year.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:06, 1 January 2014 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,936

edits

Navigation menu