Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Iraq: new section
Line 190: Line 190:     
:I found the opening quite off-putting and unencyclopedic. Should early voting really go on top? The "scandal" over how many Twitter followers he didn't have is amusing, but extremely trivial. The parenthetical can just say "born August 4, 1961." The birth certificate issue can go lower down. He must have the worst unemployment and growth numbers of any president since Hoover. Put those on top. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 11:32, 19 December 2013 (EST)
 
:I found the opening quite off-putting and unencyclopedic. Should early voting really go on top? The "scandal" over how many Twitter followers he didn't have is amusing, but extremely trivial. The parenthetical can just say "born August 4, 1961." The birth certificate issue can go lower down. He must have the worst unemployment and growth numbers of any president since Hoover. Put those on top. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 11:32, 19 December 2013 (EST)
 +
 +
== Iraq ==
 +
 +
As far as I know Conservapedia is not a Neoconservaitve website. So its ok if Obama opposed the [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]].--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 07:55, 6 January 2014 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, rollback
7,537

edits

Navigation menu