Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
3 bytes removed ,  03:46, January 18, 2014
s
Line 5: Line 5:  
Translations may be classified as either conservative or liberal depending on how they present these passages. The [[King James Version]] (1611), the [[New International Version]] (1978), and the [[English Standard Version]] (2001) use ''sensus plenior''. The [[Revised Standard Version]] (1952) and the [[New Revised Standard Version]] (1989) ignore New Testament interpretations and translate Hebrew text from a Jewish perspective.
 
Translations may be classified as either conservative or liberal depending on how they present these passages. The [[King James Version]] (1611), the [[New International Version]] (1978), and the [[English Standard Version]] (2001) use ''sensus plenior''. The [[Revised Standard Version]] (1952) and the [[New Revised Standard Version]] (1989) ignore New Testament interpretations and translate Hebrew text from a Jewish perspective.
   −
NRSV is the Bible translation preferred in secular and academic study, but it is rarely used by Christians. It gives the intentional sense of the Hebrew. ESV is also a revision of RSV, but it is intended for use by Evangelicals. Its translations restore the traditional Christian understanding. The authors of the New Testament were generally more familiar with the [[Septuagint]], a Greek translation of the Old Testament, than with the Hebrew original.
+
NRSV is the Bible translation preferred in secular and academic study, but it is rarely used by Christians. It gives the intentional sense of the Hebrew. ESV is also a revision of RSV, but it is intended for use by Evangelicals. Its translations restore traditional Christian understandings. The authors of the New Testament were generally more familiar with the [[Septuagint]], a Greek translation of the Old Testament, than with the Hebrew original.
    
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
14,282

edits

Navigation menu