Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
14,282
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: + +
→Fact tags.: this car is a kickback scheme
7. I’d like to see this article conform to the Conservapedia Commandments. i.e. true and verifiable, cite sources, etc. The liberal/homosexual thing comes to mind, sounds like opinion, not fact.
7. I’d like to see this article conform to the Conservapedia Commandments. i.e. true and verifiable, cite sources, etc. The liberal/homosexual thing comes to mind, sounds like opinion, not fact.
--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 21:35, 4 April 2013 (EDT)
--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 21:35, 4 April 2013 (EDT)
:The fact that [http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/09/10/Insight--GMs-Volt---The-ugly-math-of-low-sales--high-costs the $1.2 billion cost of developing of this car] is unlikely to ever be recouped certainly belongs in the article. The Volt is all about politics, a way for GM to present itself as "green." Electric cars are notorious money losers. They exist primarily [http://money.cnn.com/2013/08/06/autos/gm-chevy-volt-price/ to meet a California regulation]. Even if the techology made sense, GM is run by the auto workers union. So it will inevitably lose even more money. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 22:04, 28 January 2014 (EST)