88
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 44:
Line 44: − + +
no edit summary
:Try not to see it as bashing conservative ideals, think of it as making factual and accurate articles that don’t make conservatives look miss-informed.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 12:51, 31 January 2014 (EST)
:Try not to see it as bashing conservative ideals, think of it as making factual and accurate articles that don’t make conservatives look miss-informed.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 12:51, 31 January 2014 (EST)
::Like you're here to make conservatives look more informed. Aren't we "[http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AMain_Page&action=historysubmit&diff=1073053&oldid=1073052 lunatic fringe climate deniers]"? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 22:29, 31 January 2014 (EST)
::Like you're here to make conservatives look more informed. Aren't we "[http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AMain_Page&action=historysubmit&diff=1073053&oldid=1073052 lunatic fringe climate deniers]"? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 22:29, 31 January 2014 (EST)
:::If someone parrots the climate change rants of Monckton and Limbaugh? Then yeah, I’d say they subscribe to the lunatic fringe. Not all conservatives hold such views. The original version of this article made a bunch of literally stupid claims. The Volt is a fashion accessory, it is subsidized with factory rebates, emits harmful radiation, likely to electrocute passengers in a crash, the engine is not hooked up to the wheels, liberals and homosexuals have limited knowledge of automobiles, etc. If a person took the earlier versions of this article as gospel, they’d look rather silly regurgitating their ''facts'' to a knowledgeable Volt owner. Looks like I’m actually trying to make conservatives ''look more informed''.
--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 00:36, 1 February 2014 (EST)
==Further Reading==
==Further Reading==
The Conservative News and Views article is a travesty of journalism filled with numerous faults and should not be featured under ''Further reading''.
The Conservative News and Views article is a travesty of journalism filled with numerous faults and should not be featured under ''Further reading''.