88
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 86:
Line 86: +
no edit summary
http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-resources/refs.html
http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-resources/refs.html
:If we could afford to buy [http://www.thenewamerican.com/economy/sectors/item/4387-each-chevy-volt-costs-taxpayers-$250000 a $250,000 car] for all 7 billion people on the planet, global warming would be the least of our worries. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 20:03, 2 February 2014 (EST)
:If we could afford to buy [http://www.thenewamerican.com/economy/sectors/item/4387-each-chevy-volt-costs-taxpayers-$250000 a $250,000 car] for all 7 billion people on the planet, global warming would be the least of our worries. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 20:03, 2 February 2014 (EST)
::Your reference is completely out of date. A selective use of math and assuming only Chevy Volts will use the batteries manufactured at the subsidized plants is very disingenuous. The Hamtramck plant also manufactures the Malibu. Where are these facts included in the math? Nowhere of course. Using MCC’s dubious math, selective reasoning and the increase in Volt sales, each car is now subsidized at $27,000. And this number itself is still completely inane. I’ll cut them some slack concerning the past government ownership of GM, but this doesn’t excuse anyone from using this dated reference to trash the Volt.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 19:37, 3 February 2014 (EST)