Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
elaborated the third paragraph
Line 3: Line 3:  
For example, every number above 180 has less factors than has 180, until you get to 240. Then, 240 has an additional two factors over 180. Then, no number above 240 has more factors than 240, until you get to 360, while the quantity of factors of 336 mere ''equals'' that of 240.
 
For example, every number above 180 has less factors than has 180, until you get to 240. Then, 240 has an additional two factors over 180. Then, no number above 240 has more factors than 240, until you get to 360, while the quantity of factors of 336 mere ''equals'' that of 240.
   −
Additionally, the key factor for all highly composite numbers beginning with 12 is 12. So, every highly composite number greater than 12 is divisible by twelve. And, otherwise, there is no single number (except, of course, 1) by which all highly composite numbers are divisible.
+
Additionally, the unifying number for all highly composite numbers is 12. This is because of three facts: '''1)''' the ''initiation'' above 6 is always at multiples of twelve but not always at multiples of 6; '''2)''' the initiation span from 12 to 60 is unbroken; and '''3)''' composite equivalence is unbroken from 60 to 120. These three facts together imply a spike graph beginning with 1 and ending with 120, in which there are two sequences of six spikes, in which the ''60 spike'' functions both as the final of the first sequence and as the initial of the second sequence, and the second sequence for which only its first and final numbers are initials.
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
568

edits

Navigation menu