Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎100 billion: There is an appropriate reluctance to delete educational information that some may find to be enlightening.
Line 255: Line 255:  
::So is it something that should be trimmed from the article to keep it concise? The article does look like it meanders a bit (compared to, say, [[refrigerator]]). [[User:JamesWS|JamesWS]] 19:57, 8 February 2014 (EST)
 
::So is it something that should be trimmed from the article to keep it concise? The article does look like it meanders a bit (compared to, say, [[refrigerator]]). [[User:JamesWS|JamesWS]] 19:57, 8 February 2014 (EST)
 
:::IMO, the entire "liberal abuse" section is tangental at best and should be removed.  Entropy doesn't directly relate to the issues of overpopulation or how many people the world can feed. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 01:25, 9 February 2014 (EST)
 
:::IMO, the entire "liberal abuse" section is tangental at best and should be removed.  Entropy doesn't directly relate to the issues of overpopulation or how many people the world can feed. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 01:25, 9 February 2014 (EST)
 +
 +
::::It does seem tangential, but it is placed lower in the entry.  There is an appropriate reluctance to delete educational information that some may find to be enlightening.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 03:37, 9 February 2014 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,891

edits

Navigation menu