88
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: +
Talk:Climate agenda (view source)
Revision as of 04:41, February 16, 2014
, 04:41, February 16, 2014no edit summary
:::Please explain to me using peer reviewed references how the terms climate change and global warming ''imply that the Earth has never warmed any reason other than industrial emissions.'' Please read the IPCC report from the main source instead of filtering it through a fringe source like Anthony Watts. You’ll find he is misrepresenting the UN panel. I hope you didn’t spend too much time on your Google research. Please reread my last edit to the article and then realize my sources were from the fifties and seventies. Someone made a political decision? References? Good ones this time? It’s rather sad the opening paragraphs are allowed to remain, this article makes conservative Americans look very silly. And I for one don’t like it. --[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 10:37, 15 February 2014 (EST)
:::Please explain to me using peer reviewed references how the terms climate change and global warming ''imply that the Earth has never warmed any reason other than industrial emissions.'' Please read the IPCC report from the main source instead of filtering it through a fringe source like Anthony Watts. You’ll find he is misrepresenting the UN panel. I hope you didn’t spend too much time on your Google research. Please reread my last edit to the article and then realize my sources were from the fifties and seventies. Someone made a political decision? References? Good ones this time? It’s rather sad the opening paragraphs are allowed to remain, this article makes conservative Americans look very silly. And I for one don’t like it. --[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 10:37, 15 February 2014 (EST)
::::And what is it that you don't like? And why is Anthony Watts a "fringe source"? Be specific. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 10:52, 15 February 2014 (EST)
::::And what is it that you don't like? And why is Anthony Watts a "fringe source"? Be specific. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 10:52, 15 February 2014 (EST)
:::::Let’s see. The opening paragraph starts with an unreferenced, completely false assertion and mentions evolution even though this is a climate change article. And the article continues along the same lines for several more sentences. I noticed Schlafly is making some of the most flagrant violations of the Conservapedia commandments yet nothing is being done to correct this abuse. Anthony Watts is a meteorologist without any formal education in climate science yet he is used as an authoritative source on climate change by Conservapedia. I call him a fringe source because his conclusions concerning climate change put him within the fringe of academics or pseudo-academics who agree with the 1% of legitimate climate researchers who deny anthropogenic climate change. --[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 23:41, 15 February 2014 (EST)