Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: +
Talk:Climate agenda (view source)
Revision as of 06:35, February 16, 2014
, 06:35, February 16, 2014no edit summary
:::::::Second, you need to get something straight here, Norman. We're not going to post a liberal agenda on this website. We're not going to change our position on global warming or anything else that the church of liberalism loves; to do so we would have to be complicit in a lie, and we're not going to tolerate it. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:48, 16 February 2014 (EST)
:::::::Second, you need to get something straight here, Norman. We're not going to post a liberal agenda on this website. We're not going to change our position on global warming or anything else that the church of liberalism loves; to do so we would have to be complicit in a lie, and we're not going to tolerate it. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:48, 16 February 2014 (EST)
::::::::Okay. Facts don’t matter to you, got it. What emails are you talking about? SUVs? New Jersey? The Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project demonstrated Watts didn’t know what he was talking about when he complained about the placement of climate stations. He promised to accept the conclusions of BEST but when his opinions were completely demolished he reneged. This is Conservapedia, I understand the liberal agenda won’t be posted here, give me some credit, I’m not stupid. That being said, I’d like to think conservatives, like yourself, could accept scientific reality. By the way, are you planning on doing anything about the atrocious opening sentences of this article? Don’t you think everyone should follow the Conservapedia commandments?--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 01:23, 16 February 2014 (EST)
::::::::Okay. Facts don’t matter to you, got it. What emails are you talking about? SUVs? New Jersey? The Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project demonstrated Watts didn’t know what he was talking about when he complained about the placement of climate stations. He promised to accept the conclusions of BEST but when his opinions were completely demolished he reneged. This is Conservapedia, I understand the liberal agenda won’t be posted here, give me some credit, I’m not stupid. That being said, I’d like to think conservatives, like yourself, could accept scientific reality. By the way, are you planning on doing anything about the atrocious opening sentences of this article? Don’t you think everyone should follow the Conservapedia commandments?--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 01:23, 16 February 2014 (EST)
:::::::::Facts do matter to me. And I'm not going to do anything about the article's opening sentences, and neither am I going to tolerate a liberal troll that insists on pushing a lie on this website while at the same time refusing to listen. Have a nice day. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:35, 16 February 2014 (EST)