4,994
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + +
Debate:Is "Coercive Interrogation" consistent with Christian Values? (view source)
Revision as of 01:33, April 15, 2007
, 01:33, April 15, 2007no edit summary
:Of course it is. "Coercive Interrogation" has a long and proud history of being used to fight evil. Without the use of the rack and the thumbscrew, how could the witches of the middle-ages been convinced to admit to such crimes as flying through the air, shapeshifting, cursing cattle, stealing men's er... 'members' by magic, eating babies, or having actual physical 'biblical intercourse' with Satan? Who Would Jesus Waterboard? --[[User:BobD|BobD]] 13:31, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
:Of course it is. "Coercive Interrogation" has a long and proud history of being used to fight evil. Without the use of the rack and the thumbscrew, how could the witches of the middle-ages been convinced to admit to such crimes as flying through the air, shapeshifting, cursing cattle, stealing men's er... 'members' by magic, eating babies, or having actual physical 'biblical intercourse' with Satan? Who Would Jesus Waterboard? --[[User:BobD|BobD]] 13:31, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
"Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets." Matthew 7:12. Not consistent with waterboarding unless ye would that men should waterboard you. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 21:33, 14 April 2007 (EDT)