Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 271:
Line 271: − + +
Talk:Biblical scientific foreknowledge (view source)
Revision as of 00:12, February 23, 2014
, 00:12, February 23, 2014→Distance of Oldest Star to Earth: The confirmation of the Bible by a scientific culture that tends to be atheistic in outlook is remarkable.
==Distance of Oldest Star to Earth==
==Distance of Oldest Star to Earth==
How can the source be trusted? It says the oldest star is 13.7 billion years old and implies that stars have been observed farther away, so this contradicts the article's assertion that creation occurred 6,000 years ago. How can the distance of the oldest star be taken as fact but other inconvenient facts be ignored? --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 17:10, 22 February 2014 (EST)
How can the source be trusted? It says the oldest star is 13.7 billion years old and implies that stars have been observed farther away, so this contradicts the article's assertion that creation occurred 6,000 years ago. How can the distance of the oldest star be taken as fact but other inconvenient facts be ignored? --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 17:10, 22 February 2014 (EST)
:Simple. The source can be trusted where it is right, and not where it is wrong. You are just looking for problems where there are none. Search your feelings; you know it to be true. [[User:BarrySM|BarrySM]] 18:08, 22 February 2014 (EST)
:Articles are cited here for their facts, not for any additional liberal speculation or spin that is included. There is no atheistic reason to claim 6,000 light-years away if it were not true. The confirmation of the [[Bible]] by a scientific culture that tends to be atheistic in outlook is remarkable.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:12, 22 February 2014 (EST)