Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 275: Line 275:     
::Thanks for rephrasing that for me. [[User:BarrySM|BarrySM]] 10:28, 23 February 2014 (EST)
 
::Thanks for rephrasing that for me. [[User:BarrySM|BarrySM]] 10:28, 23 February 2014 (EST)
 +
 +
:::In all seriousness, though... The article is talking about the ''oldest'' star, not the ''farthest'' star. If we were citing it to mean that ''no'' star is farther than 6,000 light-years, then the source simply doesn't hold up. And if the source is not being cited for that reason, then the statement has no grounds. Could you further clarify, please? [[User:JSchwartz|JSchwartz]] 20:48, 23 February 2014 (EST)
6

edits

Navigation menu