Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1 byte removed ,  02:56, April 15, 2007
no edit summary
Line 105: Line 105:  
:I back Tsumetai on this.  There has not been adequate (if any) attempt to resolve the issue first.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:04, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:I back Tsumetai on this.  There has not been adequate (if any) attempt to resolve the issue first.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:04, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
   −
== Submitting "[[Adult Stem Cells]]" ==
+
== Submitting "[[Adult Stem Cell]]" ==
    
I believe there is a bias inherent in this article that has been undefended.  It currently strikes an un-encyclopedic tone which I have tried to remedy to no avail.  CPanel, please inspect [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adult_stem_cells&diff=107840&oldid=107836 this comparison] to tell us which version is more encyclopedic, and more neutral.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:56, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
 
I believe there is a bias inherent in this article that has been undefended.  It currently strikes an un-encyclopedic tone which I have tried to remedy to no avail.  CPanel, please inspect [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adult_stem_cells&diff=107840&oldid=107836 this comparison] to tell us which version is more encyclopedic, and more neutral.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:56, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
2,732

edits

Navigation menu