I just read this page, and noticed one strange thing. It mentions several reasons why old-earth theories are flawed, then lists several views of different people throughout the ages, while the '''actual accepted theory''' is described in one single, fairly vague line. Would it not be more useful to dedicate this article to a summary of proof/evidence for young-earth creationism?
+
I just read this page, and noticed one strange thing. It mentions several reasons why old-earth theories are flawed, then lists several views of different people throughout the ages, while the '''actual accepted theory''' is described in one single, fairly vague line. Would it not be more useful to dedicate this article to a summary of proof/evidence for young-earth creationism? -[[User:MalP|Mal Peeters]] ([[User_talk:MalP|talk]]) 13:56, 29 March 2014 (EDT)