686
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 273:
Line 273: + + + +
→Point of view
:Regardless, it still doesn't affect the argument that similarities could be due to a common designer (using similar proteins for similar functions).
:Regardless, it still doesn't affect the argument that similarities could be due to a common designer (using similar proteins for similar functions).
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:33, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:33, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
:It is a combination of DNA and protein matching to get that number. Although it is important to note that not every ape is as close as others. I will agree that it does not make any statement towards the similarities that could be due to a designer.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 07:24, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
:Just for my curiosity, what are these scientists claiming about the T-rex/chicken relationship (if anything)? That various dinosaurs independently evolved into different birds, or that some dinosaur evolved into a bird, from which all modern birds are descended, and that chickens are the nearest thing to that original bird? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:36, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
:Just for my curiosity, what are these scientists claiming about the T-rex/chicken relationship (if anything)? That various dinosaurs independently evolved into different birds, or that some dinosaur evolved into a bird, from which all modern birds are descended, and that chickens are the nearest thing to that original bird? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:36, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
:I can not say. The paper only reported the similarities and showed the genetic distance of other families of animals from the dinosaurs. They made no claim about the method of descent just that there was a relationship.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 07:24, 15 April 2007 (EDT)