278
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 38:
Line 38: + + +
Talk:Irreducible complexity (view source)
Revision as of 13:21, April 15, 2007
, 13:21, April 15, 2007→Flaws: false analogy
That's better. Please put it back, and let's see if it sticks. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 10:57, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
That's better. Please put it back, and let's see if it sticks. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 10:57, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
:It seems to have stuck. Unfortunately this whole approach is equating [[creationism|creationist]] (AKA [[intelligent design]]) [[faith]] ([[ideology]]?) with [[science]]. That is of course an example of silliness, like trying to compare apples and pears, a [[false analogy]]. This causes no end of head scratching when trying to apply [[Conservapedia:Locks and Blocks|locks and blocks]] to protect the article because ''we do not block for ideological reasons'' [([[faith]]?) ...] ''but for silliness'' ([[false analogy]]).
:[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 09:21, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
== Behe's flawed argument ==
== Behe's flawed argument ==