Changes

The main page contributions should to reflect the full range of editors who work together to make this site run. As of the [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&limit=500&action=history last 500 edits], 7 users make all of the contributions to the [[Template:Mainpageright|MPR]] news sections with 92.6% being made by only 3. While there is a [[Talk:Main_Page#MPR_Article_Suggestion|section on the main talk page]] for suggesting news stories, it seems to be little known and even less used. This has led to frustration/confusion among editors (See [[Talk:Main_Page#Proposal_for_a_Main_Page_Committee|here]]) and even a very well respected and experienced SYSOP in another case (as witnessed [[User_talk:Aschlafly#News_items_for_the_main_page|here]]). I don't know whether the rotating committee, a more visible "suggestion box" or something else entirely is the best option for getting a wider array of important stories on the Main Page, but I feel it's clear that something needs to be done. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 01:51, 2 May 2013 (EDT)

The main page contributions should to reflect the full range of editors who work together to make this site run. As of the [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&limit=500&action=history last 500 edits], 7 users make all of the contributions to the [[Template:Mainpageright|MPR]] news sections with 92.6% being made by only 3. While there is a [[Talk:Main_Page#MPR_Article_Suggestion|section on the main talk page]] for suggesting news stories, it seems to be little known and even less used. This has led to frustration/confusion among editors (See [[Talk:Main_Page#Proposal_for_a_Main_Page_Committee|here]]) and even a very well respected and experienced SYSOP in another case (as witnessed [[User_talk:Aschlafly#News_items_for_the_main_page|here]]). I don't know whether the rotating committee, a more visible "suggestion box" or something else entirely is the best option for getting a wider array of important stories on the Main Page, but I feel it's clear that something needs to be done. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 01:51, 2 May 2013 (EDT)

I have made a proposal to create a three-editor committee for editing the main page. You can comment on it [[Talk:Main_Page#Proposal_for_a_Main_Page_Committee|here]]. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 05:44, 2 May 2013 (EDT)

I have made a proposal to create a three-editor committee for editing the main page. You can comment on it [[Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/127#Proposal_for_a_Main_Page_Committee|here]]. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 05:44, 2 May 2013 (EDT)

The main page is largely rubbish, including links to some of the most numbingly stupid articles and links to really poorly researched blogs. Doesn't any other editor feel ashamed that science is routinely degraded while silly nonsense from old books is treated as unassailable fact? Enough of the stupid! A detailed plan for improving the main page is not difficult to compose: remove it, it's a disgrace. --[[User:TonySidaway|TonySidaway]] 23:38, 7 May 2013 (EDT)

The main page is largely rubbish, including links to some of the most numbingly stupid articles and links to really poorly researched blogs. Doesn't any other editor feel ashamed that science is routinely degraded while silly nonsense from old books is treated as unassailable fact? Enough of the stupid! A detailed plan for improving the main page is not difficult to compose: remove it, it's a disgrace. --[[User:TonySidaway|TonySidaway]] 23:38, 7 May 2013 (EDT)

:::TonySidaway, It's atheist/liberals who degrade science by trying to make it subservient to their atheist and/or Darwinist religions. Second, you are just mad that God made Adam and Eve and not Adam and Steve. That is why you are mad at the book of [[Genesis]]. It points out your unnatural lifestyle. And medical science points out how unhealthy the homosexual life is. See: [[Homosexuality and health]].  Homosexual activists try to distort what medical science says about the unhealthy homosexual lifestyle and try to declare the lifestyle healthy which it is not. See: [[Homosexual activists' ideology and loss of life]].  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 08:36, 12 May 2013 (EDT)

:::TonySidaway, It's atheist/liberals who degrade science by trying to make it subservient to their atheist and/or Darwinist religions. Second, you are just mad that God made Adam and Eve and not Adam and Steve. That is why you are mad at the book of [[Genesis]]. It points out your unnatural lifestyle. And medical science points out how unhealthy the homosexual life is. See: [[Homosexuality and health]].  Homosexual activists try to distort what medical science says about the unhealthy homosexual lifestyle and try to declare the lifestyle healthy which it is not. See: [[Homosexual activists' ideology and loss of life]].  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 08:36, 12 May 2013 (EDT)

DonnyC, one thing for sure, it is a very BAD year for you being able to respond to reasonable criticisms of your Darwinist religion. See: [[User:Conservative/DonnyC dodged this rejoinder|DonnyC dodged this rejoinder]]. Upon your return and after your probationary 3 month period, you must respond to[[User:Conservative/DonnyC dodged this rejoinder|this rejoinder]] should you want to post to me on the main page talk page again. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 08:45, 12 May 2013 (EDT)

DonnyC, one thing for sure, it is a very BAD year for you being able to respond to reasonable criticisms of your Darwinist religion. See: [[User:Conservative/DonnyC dodged this rejoinder|DonnyC dodged this rejoinder]]. Upon your return and after your probationary 3 month period, you must respond to[[User:Conservative/DonnyC dodged this rejoinder|this rejoinder]] should you want to post to me on the main page talk page again. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 08:45, 12 May 2013 (EDT)

==Maybe==

==Maybe==