1,019
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: +
→Attribution
With such a controversial topic it is essential to add proper attribution to claims. Unless you can objectively prove that information can only come into existence by intelligent means, then it is inappropriate to state something as fact. [[User:RDre|RDre]] 11:36, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
With such a controversial topic it is essential to add proper attribution to claims. Unless you can objectively prove that information can only come into existence by intelligent means, then it is inappropriate to state something as fact. [[User:RDre|RDre]] 11:36, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
:Science does not "prove", but can succeed or fail to disprove. Can you dispute (disprove) the claim? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:42, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
:Science does not "prove", but can succeed or fail to disprove. Can you dispute (disprove) the claim? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:42, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
::Perhaps we'd do better to defer this discussion until we've got a neutral description of what information theory actually states. Once we've got that down, then we could discuss its implications. Thoughts? [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 11:45, 15 April 2007 (EDT)