SkipCaptcha
3,261
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: +
Reply
::I am inclined to agree with you. Nonetheless, there is a long-standing tradition that the edits of senior editors not be reverted. I do believe that ''Conservapedia'', as a resource for homeschooled children, does not need content on such vile subjects as human sexuality.--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 18:36, 25 May 2014 (EDT)
::I am inclined to agree with you. Nonetheless, there is a long-standing tradition that the edits of senior editors not be reverted. I do believe that ''Conservapedia'', as a resource for homeschooled children, does not need content on such vile subjects as human sexuality.--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 18:36, 25 May 2014 (EDT)
:::*Then, we should ask the whole CP community about that. Lets discuss it [[Talk:Main Page|here]].--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 08:28, 27 May 2014 (EDT)
:::*Then, we should ask the whole CP community about that. Lets discuss it [[Talk:Main Page|here]].--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 08:28, 27 May 2014 (EDT)
::::No. Let's discuss it here. It is common sense that young impressionable minds should not have their heads filled with filth like human sexuality, despite what the [[lamestream media]], [[Wikipedia]], or the [[public school]] system and their [[Common Core]] balderdash may think. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 14:43, 6 June 2014 (EDT)