Changes

→‎Elaboration: "υἱὸς ὁ ἄνθρωπος" doesn't wash, because that Greek phrase would be translated as "Son the man" or "Son the human being," falsely implying in English there was another son who was no
Line 763: Line 763:  
*Jesus Christ listener heard that he described himself as "Son of Man", not less, not more. They understood, that he was the Son of God, but this took an insight. A modern reader should get the same insight, and should not be forced on his path by words Jesus Christ  d i d  n o t  u t t e r.
 
*Jesus Christ listener heard that he described himself as "Son of Man", not less, not more. They understood, that he was the Son of God, but this took an insight. A modern reader should get the same insight, and should not be forced on his path by words Jesus Christ  d i d  n o t  u t t e r.
 
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 06:09, 23 June 2014 (EDT)
 
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 06:09, 23 June 2014 (EDT)
 +
 +
:A literal translation would be "the Son, a human being."  It would not be properly translated as "the Son of man," a nonsensical phrase in English.  Your claim that the Greek for "the Son, a human being" would read "υἱὸς ὁ ἄνθρωπος" doesn't wash, because that Greek phrase would be translated as "Son the man" or "Son the human being," falsely implying in English there was another son who was not a human being.  Rather, the Greek clarifies that the Son IS a human being, and hence "the Son, a human being" in English.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:21, 23 June 2014 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,255

edits