| Line 2,304: |
Line 2,304: |
| | | | |
| | __TOC__ <!--Do not remove this. We want to keep insights on the first screen of viewing--> | | __TOC__ <!--Do not remove this. We want to keep insights on the first screen of viewing--> |
| − |
| |
| − | == Terms Difficult to Classify ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | These new terms are difficult to classify:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {| class="wikitable sortable"
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | !Term
| |
| − | !Origin date
| |
| − | !Comments
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |[[affirmative action|affirmative action]]
| |
| − | |1961
| |
| − | |first used in [http://www.thecre.com/fedlaw/legal6/eo10925.htm JFK's Executive Order 10925] in 1961 and subsequently promoted by [[LBJ]].
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |Americanism
| |
| − | |1781
| |
| − | |Originally, a phrase unique to American English, later, loyalty to America and its principles
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |bipartisan
| |
| − | |1909
| |
| − | |emphasized by liberals when they are in the minority in power, but ignored by liberals when they are the majority in power
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |colonist
| |
| − | |1701
| |
| − | |settlers of a new country
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |compartmentalize
| |
| − | |1925
| |
| − | |compartmentalizing the Bible away from knowledge and education leads to ignorance and despair
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |contrarian
| |
| − | |1657
| |
| − | |someone who delights in taking a position contrary to others
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |eclectic
| |
| − | |1683
| |
| − | |taking the best from among different styles or ideas; compare [[best of the public]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |evangelism
| |
| − | |1620-30
| |
| − | |"isms" are usually pejorative, though this acquired a positive meaning over time, and perhaps from the outset
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |genetics
| |
| − | |1905
| |
| − | |perhaps this should be on the conservative list?
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |identity politics
| |
| − | |1988
| |
| − | |exploiting racial, ethnic, gender alliances for political gain
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |inane
| |
| − | |1662
| |
| − | |refers to comments, often made by liberals, that are utterly devoid of substance
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |junk legislation
| |
| − | |1980s
| |
| − | |used initially by liberals to complain about the lack of meaningful legislation
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |missionary
| |
| − | |1635-1645
| |
| − | |conservative?
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |multitasking
| |
| − | |1966
| |
| − | |performing multiple tasks all at once
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |polar coordinates
| |
| − | |1694
| |
| − | |Newton may have used it earlier
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |republican
| |
| − | |1685
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |reverse engineer
| |
| − | |1973
| |
| − | |to deconstruct a product (or software) in order to understand how it works, often with the purpose of copying it
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |scrooge
| |
| − | |1843
| |
| − | |the main character in Charles Dickens' ''A Christmas Carol''; the story is based on materialism and is often used as a substitute for the Biblical account, but charity is a conservative value
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |smoke and mirrors
| |
| − | |1982
| |
| − | |describes the use of deceit, particularly in politics; probably a conservative term, but will await more etymology about it
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |soapbox
| |
| − | |1907
| |
| − | |now used pejoratively, but probably not initially when it was a way for the public to participate
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |states' rights
| |
| − | |1790
| |
| − | |liberals often invoke this too; Democrats were its biggest champions in the 1800s (in connection with slavery), and even today on issues like legalizing drugs and same-sex marriage
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |technocrat
| |
| − | |1932
| |
| − | |technical expert
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |telecommute
| |
| − | |1974<ref>The first use of this term was in the British magazine ''The Economist''.</ref>
| |
| − | |a combination of a Greek root ("tele", which means "far off") and a Latin root ("commutare", which means "to exchange")
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |toady
| |
| − | |1826
| |
| − | |a toady caves into peer pressure to seek acceptance by others: "the largest gathering of toadies is by college students herded into Obama campaign rallies"
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |tomfoolery
| |
| − | |1812
| |
| − | |playful or foolish behavior
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |traditionalism
| |
| − | |1856
| |
| − | |"beliefs of those opposed to [[modernism]], [[liberalism]], or [[radicalism]]"
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |[[twilight zone]]
| |
| − | |1949
| |
| − | |the realm of imagination that seems impossible but is difficult to disprove, and which challenges ordinary views of reality; also the terminator between night and day on a planetary body
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |Whip<ref>In its political usage.</ref>
| |
| − | |late 1800s
| |
| − | |An elected position in each political party for the legislator responsible for gathering and confirming support for the party position on particular bills. This term is derived from "whipper-in," which in fox-hunting refers to the man who prevents hunting dogs from straying amid a chase.<ref>http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2010/11/durbin_re-elected_number_two_s.html</ref>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |wiki
| |
| − | |1995
| |
| − | |a website (or website software) that facilitates contributions and corrections by the public
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |working class
| |
| − | |1789
| |
| − | |those who work regular, 40-hour weeks in manual labor, such as factory jobs
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |}
| |
| | | | |
| | == Sources == | | == Sources == |
| Line 2,452: |
Line 2,320: |
| | *[[Conservative Words Not Yet Recognized by the Dictionary]] | | *[[Conservative Words Not Yet Recognized by the Dictionary]] |
| | *[[Downgraded Conservative Terms]] | | *[[Downgraded Conservative Terms]] |
| | + | *[[Terms Difficult to Classify]] |
| | | | |
| | {{Conservatism}} | | {{Conservatism}} |