1,019
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 160:
Line 160: + +
→Malicious Redirect
:: I'd just ignore this. I think it simply attracts attention to Conservapedia. The perpetrators are defeating their own purpose, which even they will realize eventually. That "something else" in Tsumetai's message is probably something our legitimate visitors would not type. Over time Google will drop it also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:04, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
:: I'd just ignore this. I think it simply attracts attention to Conservapedia. The perpetrators are defeating their own purpose, which even they will realize eventually. That "something else" in Tsumetai's message is probably something our legitimate visitors would not type. Over time Google will drop it also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:04, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
:::Sorry, I should have been more clear. That "something else" could be anything at all, or even nothing. Their content is our content, and Google's bots are crawling their URLs. So ''any'' Google search which returns one of our pages ought to return one of theirs too. The only question is how high up their results get. I've already seen a couple on the first page of a search. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 19:11, 15 April 2007 (EDT)