| | '''Metapedia''' is a [[wiki]] site, established ''circa'' 2005-2006, that promotes a Euro-centric point of view, a racist view of politics, culture, and the arts and sciences. Available in English and now in ten additional languages, Metapedia also maintains links to WikiSlavia, in Russian and Siberian. The site labels the Holocaust as "the holohoax" and denigrates both the character and intelligence of black people, Jews and other non-European peoples. The site lists [[Conservapedia]] accuses Conservapedia of promoting a [[Neoconservative|neoconservative]] world view and being "rife with [[Marxism|Marxist]] phraseology,"<ref>Metapedia's article on Conservapedia, as of 7/13/2010</ref> presumably because Conservapedia condemns [[Evolutionary racism|evolutionary racism]], which Metapedia explicitly supports. | | '''Metapedia''' is a [[wiki]] site, established ''circa'' 2005-2006, that promotes a Euro-centric point of view, a racist view of politics, culture, and the arts and sciences. Available in English and now in ten additional languages, Metapedia also maintains links to WikiSlavia, in Russian and Siberian. The site labels the Holocaust as "the holohoax" and denigrates both the character and intelligence of black people, Jews and other non-European peoples. The site lists [[Conservapedia]] accuses Conservapedia of promoting a [[Neoconservative|neoconservative]] world view and being "rife with [[Marxism|Marxist]] phraseology,"<ref>Metapedia's article on Conservapedia, as of 7/13/2010</ref> presumably because Conservapedia condemns [[Evolutionary racism|evolutionary racism]], which Metapedia explicitly supports. |
| | The English-language version of Metapedia currently has slightly more than 20000 articles. A random sample includes a rather superficial treatment of some subjects, and a more detailed treatment of others, but in some cases with highly dubious historical accuracy. | | The English-language version of Metapedia currently has slightly more than 20000 articles. A random sample includes a rather superficial treatment of some subjects, and a more detailed treatment of others, but in some cases with highly dubious historical accuracy. |