95
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + +
Debate:Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation? (view source)
Revision as of 18:45, August 10, 2014
, 18:45, August 10, 2014no edit summary
Without the poor there is no scale by which to judge the wealthy. With no negative there is no positive. Polarization makes the world go round. Conservative need Liberals and Liberals need Conservatives. Though I don't understand why religion (specifically christianity) is so necessary in Conservative belief. Ayn Rand was an Atheist.[[User:DaveGBx|DaveGBx]] 10:57, 10 December 2009 (EST)
Without the poor there is no scale by which to judge the wealthy. With no negative there is no positive. Polarization makes the world go round. Conservative need Liberals and Liberals need Conservatives. Though I don't understand why religion (specifically christianity) is so necessary in Conservative belief. Ayn Rand was an Atheist.[[User:DaveGBx|DaveGBx]] 10:57, 10 December 2009 (EST)
Whether or not people are allowed to reach their full potential, there will always be poor because there will always be people who are lazy, don't want to work and fulfill their true potential, and rather live on government handouts than do honest, hard work. Anyway, I don't really see Objectivism changing anytime soon, even though I can see perhaps a theist/deistic strand of Objectivism develop one day. But other than that, I don't think Objectivists will go beyond what Ayn Rand developed. -ToileroftheSea