Changes

Instead, what you offered in return was name calling, feeble personal attacks and hysterics.   

Instead, what you offered in return was name calling, feeble personal attacks and hysterics.   

You might be reasonable in other matters, but when it comes to Darwinism, you have been very unreasonable and closed-minded which are not the characteristics of someone wanting to conduct valid historical investigations. One of the roles of an encyclopedia is to provide a resource on historical matters. And you have offered no reasonable historical information in opposition to the material I offered. You merely asserted it was idiotic to think that Darwinist ideology was a causal factor for WWI.  Argument by mere assertion is illegitimate. And you compounded your illogical behavior by acting in a boorish manner. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:49, 10 August 2014 (EDT)

You might be reasonable in other matters, but when it comes to Darwinism, you have been very unreasonable and closed-minded which are not the characteristics of someone wanting to conduct valid historical investigations. One of the roles of an encyclopedia is to provide a resource on historical matters. And you have offered no reasonable historical information in opposition to the material I offered. You merely asserted it was idiotic to think that Darwinist ideology was a causal factor for WWI.  Argument by mere assertion is illegitimate. And you compounded your illogical behavior by acting in a boorish manner.

 

Lastly, if you contend that [[social Darwinism]] did not play a very significant role in terms of being a causal factor for WWI, could you please give me the full name of Charles Darwin's most famous work?  Was the title of this book ''The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life?'' [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:03, 10 August 2014 (EDT)